Own It

by Irritable Pundit 12. November 2012 00:01

Brushfire of Freedom

The Irritable Pundit

Long column this week.


We lost.  Now everyone is either trying to understand why, or going pseudo Galt or both.


Why did we lose? Well, the data doesn't lie.


First and foremost, Romney received less votes than McCain (millions).  Think about that. Less of Romney's base came out than for McCain. This is not a "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot" moment. Romney ran as a middle-of-the-road "work across the isle" moderate, and conservatives simply stayed home.  I knew this would be an issue, but I never suspected it would be this major -- no one did. Romney depressed the reliable conservative vote. Wow.


And why not? Although he viscously nuked the competition during the primaries, he praised Obama's like-ability and completely ignored the base during most of the general election. Constant refrains of "Obama's a nice guy but…" just didn't fly. It wasn't anti-Mormonism. It wasn't any "fill in the blank" theory of the month. Romney simply ran a campaign aimed at the middle and lost. 


There were other issues too. For example, Hurricane Sandy and a loving embrace by Chris Christie setup truly awful optics for us just as people were going to the polls. However it was a campaign aimed at everyone but the base that really hurt. Don't even try to argue the point. Obama received 9 million less votes than last time but we were still creamed. 


Ignore the base at your peril dear pols. 


The funniest bit was that the media claimed Romney was an arch conservative anyway, and scared libs dutifully lined up to vote against him. When do we finally learn that trick? You can act as reasonable as you want, but the media will always call you Hitler-level evil or Stupid (or both). 


All in all, I'm pretty upset about the Left's greed and stupidity in foisting this destructive idiot on us for 4 more years, but those parasites are going to get what they deserve.


Now, for the important bit.


All the demographic handwringing on TV is nonsense, with one exception. The youth vote. 


The youth vote supposedly wasn't going to be a factor but they came out big. This is more important than you might first think, as political proclivity is generally lifelong and the youth vote went against us on cultural issues almost exclusively. This is the voter of tomorrow my friends, and regardless of race class or creed, exit polls state that they completely disagree with us on three major cultural issues.


1) Abortion.

I am anti-abortion. Got that? Great. We lost long ago. It has been legal for 40 years. It will not become illegal. Your tax dollars have been surreptitiously paying for it for almost all of that 40 years. You will not change this either, as any change will just be accounting tricks. This ship has sailed. Instead of giving stupid Republican candidates opportunities to show their ignorance about rape and therefore costing yourself elections, teach your children it is wrong and win demographically (you will outnumber them in the end). As a matter of law it is settled, win within your own home and church. 


All that said, I will happily organize a soap-in-sock beat down of Akin. His stupidity cost us the youth vote far beyond any expected effect on his own race. His rape comments were not only repeated high and low, but left other candidates vulnerable to unscrupulous followups that occasionally cost us decent people (Murdock).


2) Gay Marriage.

I am not gay, I am religious, and I am married. That said, let it go. It is already legal in some States, therefore it is already happening. The world has not ended. Our marriages are still valid and fulfilling …mostly (I keed, I keed). Don't give me the one man/one woman argument unless you want me to bring up the number of wives (and concubines) of King Solomon. Again, win at home or church, but you will not stop this tide. 


Personally, I couldn't care less what consenting adults do or who they do it with, and why should they be spared the joy of mother-in-laws?


3) The War On Drugs.

The young realize that most of us tried pot and survived just fine.  They think prohibition is self defeating, makes matters worse, and that we are hypocrites on this issue. They are right.  The nation survived prohibition ending on booze, we will survive this as well.


As a side note, I'm from Colorado. Pot legalization helped drive the youth vote in Colorado in numbers no one guessed beforehand. It passed and pushed Obama over the line here. Think about that long and hard.


Interestingly enough, all 3 are morality issues so win their hearts Social Conservatives. You can not hope to legislate these particular issues any longer.


See you next week.




Contact The Irritable Pundit     Brushfire Home


Copyright 2012.  The published content is the sole property of the author.  Any copy, use, or redistribution of any portion of the material without the written consent of the owner is a violation of international copyright laws.


United States Sister 
November 12. 2012 16:38
Well done dear brother. Well done.

United States Dirk The Impailer 
November 13. 2012 06:54
Dirk The Impailer
You have to realize that there are a lot of us that are social conservatives.  We just don't see a huge difference between the Demon-RATS and Republicans when it comes to economic issues when they have the power.  Republicans may talk the good talk, but we sure don't walk that same walk economoically when we have the power.

So if you get your way, and we drop the social issues that are important to a huge chunk of the Republican base, you are going to lose a lot more voters than didn't vote this time.

The Demon-RATS already own all of the evil side of moral issues.  Joining them in supporting evil (either actively or by ommission) will not gain us any votes.  but you will instantly lose people like me and my wife.  If the choice is evil and more evil, why waste the time.  No thanks...

United States Jenny C 
November 13. 2012 07:34
Jenny C
Might was well give up on the gun issues too.  We re-elected the most anti-gun -rights president in the history of this country.  As soon as he flips the Supreme Court with a few more "wise" liberals, they are going to take them away anyway.  It's all in the "interpretation".

Heck, why should we stand for anything for that matter?  We can just run as those people that aren't Democrats.  Yeah, that will work.  

November 15. 2012 11:01
Pingback from imao.us

IMAO » Blog Archive  » Chickens. Home. Roost. Some Assembly Required

United States A not so wise man 
November 15. 2012 11:59
A not so wise man
Well that was an interesting read...
But let's just say (for a moment)that we got what we paid for... I.E. we nominated a representative that came out swinging, yet didn't provide anything for the constituents to hold onto. I hear over and over again that many people didn't vote due to the fact that they were dissatisfied with both candidates and really didn't have a reason to change the current office as Romney didn't leave the impression that he could or would change anything. If you switch a donkey for a mule, you still get an ass...

The party needs a leader who will lead, and by lead, I mean walk with determination in a specific direction that others will want to follow. Where is our Pied Piper?

Comments are closed



Comment RSS
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2014 Brushfire Sparks