It’s Just Illegal

by Ramarious 18. November 2009 05:00

 Brushfire of Freedom 

Ram Rants

This week, the woman Obama has put in charge of defending our country (Homeland Security) has announced it is time to push for “immigration reform”.  For those who’ve not been following this administration that closely, everything they want to change is couched in the concept of “reform”.   Health care “reform” is not so much reform as a complete conversion of the existing system to a European-style Socialized medicine.  It’s not immigration “reform” that Janet wants.  She wants amnesty for illegal immigrants.  She wants criminals, who are in this country illegally, to be given a pass on breaking the law.  Apparently, Janet is having trouble with the term “illegal”.  Let me see if I can help.

If you are found guilty of killing someone, you are an “illegal killer”, otherwise known as a murderer.  In this country, it is illegal to kill someone without “just cause” i.e. self defense, etc.  If we apply Janet’s logic, we should push for “murder reform” so that those who want to kill freely in this country can do so without fear of persecution.  After all, a murderer is only doing the job that other Americans won’t do, right?

Ok, maybe a bit harsh.  Perhaps comparing murder to illegal immigration is a bit over the top.  After all, illegal immigration is a “victimless crime”, right? 

An aside for a moment.  Please note that three American citizens are currently in Iran, having been arrested for entering illegally.  They are in jail, charged with espionage (spying for those who went to Berkley), and may well spend the next several years in jail, if they are not executed.  That’s real jail, as in an Iranian prison, not “club fed” like Gitmo.  They will not receive catered meals of their choosing based on their dietary requirements.  They will not be allowed prayer time.  They are, and will remain, in prison.

Now let’s compare immigration, a privilege, to driving, also a privilege.  This is more “apples to apples” and appears to be the “comparison du jour” for the libs supporting Socialized medicine.  

In order to operate a motor vehicle legally in most of these United States, you are required to demonstrate the basic skills needed to operate the vehicle safely, then you are required to pay a tax (no, it’s not a fee) and register your information with your state of residence.  In return, the state grants you the privilege to drive, providing a license to indicate that privilege has been granted for a specific period of time.  At the end of that time frame, you are required to renew the license to extend the privilege.  Your driving record may be evaluated, some states require periodic re-demonstration of skills, but if you have not significantly violated the law, you will have your privilege extended.      

To legally enter this country, you must go through a process, fill out forms, get a work visa, student visa, or some other form of “license”, then you can stay in the country for a specific time.  At the end of the specified time, you must re-register, extending the time you can stay.  At some point, you can apply for citizenship, and if granted you would no longer require a license because you would no longer be considered a visitor to our nation, but a part of the family.  By the way, if you ever want to see real Americans, go to a ceremony where immigrants are sworn in as citizens.  There is nothing like the look on the face of a newly minted American.

Now, let’s apply Janet’s idea of reform to the driving privilege.  First, anyone in this country who is driving without a license for any reason should automatically have their privilege restored.  This includes DUI’s, vehicular homicides, and anyone who has lost their license.  This is the “amnesty” part of Janet’s plan.  Next let’s ensure that anyone can get a license to drive, no matter their age or qualifications.  After all, Janet wants to eliminate all barriers to entry to this nation.  A note, last time someone did that, Castro unloaded several boatloads of his criminals onto our shores.  But that won’t happen with other countries, will it?  

Now that we’ve restored all driving privileges and eliminated all barriers to driving, let’s give auto insurance to anyone who wants it.  We’ll also need to give them a car, as a driving privilege is really useless without a car.  This is equivalent to Janet and her pals Nancy and Harry giving illegal immigrants health care, welfare, food stamps, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in aid and benefits just because they are here.  Illegally.  Yes, our three illegal immigrants in Iran may well die in jail, but you can enter the US and hit the mother load.  Thanks Janet!

Now that our illegal drivers have amnesty, benefits, and cars, let’s turn them loose on the roads.  They should be free to drive wherever they’d like, for that is the American dream, according to Janet.  They should not be stopped for violating laws, much as illegal immigrants remain in this country today even after they are arrested, in some cases many times.  Janet wants those criminals to be set free on our soil, so why should we stop those who drive drunk from ever driving again?  How cruel can we be?

That, in a nut shell, is what Janet, Harry, Barry, and Nancy all seek.  Their reasons for it are not an issue.  They want to de-criminalize criminals.  If a person is in this country illegally, they have already broken the law.  Much like a drunk driver, they should have their privilege revoked.  They should be deported immediately, and restricted from submitting for legal entry for a period of time, let’s say six months.  They should be forced to pay a fine, just like the guy with the DUI.  After all, they are doing the jobs that American’s won’t do, but they are getting paid in cash, usually not paying taxes, and can afford the fine while still having some fresh loot to take back home.  Those who are caught crossing a second time should again be deported, with suspension of legal privilege for a year.  Third time, jailed in the US under our three-strikes rule.  Let’s send them to Gitmo, I hear there’s a great steak on Friday.

Dearest Janet, this is what illegal means.  It means you broke the law.  Criminals should not be rewarded, just like those who get DUI’s are not allowed to drive.  As Willie Horton should never have been furloughed, we should not give criminal immigrants amnesty for their crimes.  In the favorite words of your party, it’s just not fair.   

       

     

Contact Ramarious Brushfire Home

Copyright 2009.  The published content is the sole property of the author.  Any copy, use, or redistribution of any portion of the material without the written consent of the owner is a violation of international copyright laws.

Comments


United States Brittanicus 
November 18. 2009 17:34
Brittanicus
We think that today's administration under President Obama or previous political parties had a goal of enforcing our immigration laws. But corrupt politicians intervened on behalf of the open border fanatics and special interest lobbyists. As with E-Verify that has become a spotlighted enforcement law, because it was originally nearly tabled by Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). But public uproar caused them to forcibly change their decisions and fully fund E-Verify for another 3 years. WITHOUT PUBLIC SUPPORT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE CAVED-IN?  Right now it is the--ONLY--true enforcement tool implemented, but it is only as good--IF--business owners are forced to use it. Even though hundreds of thousands of companies have now decided to apply it, yet it is not MANDATORY?  It is up to the discretion of employers? In a few states Representatives have introduced it into law, as with the fed's issuing an ultimatum that all contractors/subcontractors must use E-Verify. Remember E-Verify does not need buses for deportation? Those here will self-deport. It will take time, but without access to jobs--THEY EVENTUALLY WILL LEAVE.  THEY CALL IT "ATTRITION?"

Justifiably bloggers should be either criticized for their anti-sovereignty stand, or praised for informing the unaware public of the taxpayers money needed to fund a 2009-2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Rewarding the millions already illegally squatting here, with the costs to support families, children and those kin who will come here through sponsorship. THEN THE MILLIONS MORE WHO HAVE HEARD THE CALL FOR AMNESTY AND RUSH TO GET HERE FROM POOR NATIONS, BEFORE THE NEW LAW MATERIALIZES?

House Judiciary Committee's Ranking Member Lamar Smith (R-Texas) wrote an op-ed for the Washington Times today He stated that the Washington Times had slammed the Obama Administration for hardened enforcement. While the opposite reaction came from the open border advocates saying there was too much enforcement. However Rep. Smith determined the opposite?  This is his statement:-

    * Rescinding of the "no-match" rule that prevents the Social Security Administration from contacting employers when a new hires name and social security number don't match their records. "Without this protection, many employers will continue to employ individuals they know are illegal and are taking jobs that should go to citizens and legal residents," Smith said.
    * Repeal of REAL ID in lieu of PASS ID, which makes it easier for illegal aliens to obtain a driver's license. "This makes it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the country. And it can provide terrorists with a legitimate ID - as we saw with the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists, who between them obtained 30 driver's licenses and ID cards," Smith said.
    * Lack of funding for an airport biometric exit system that is part of a DHS proposal to monitor when foreign visitors leave the country. "40 percent of all 12 million to 20 million illegal immigrants in the United States entered the country legally but overstayed their visas. This program will show who did not leave the country when they should have," Smith said.
    * Restricted the 287(g) program by limiting the ways local law enforcement officials can help federal immigration enforcement officials.
    * No funding for border fence, which was required by the Secure Fence Act of 2006.
    * Signing the CHIP bill making it easier for illegal aliens to get health care.
    * Reduced work site enforcement by shifting the focus away from the illegal workers and onto the businesses that hire them.
    * Allow states to provide in-state tuition to illegal aliens even though it violate federal law.

Reading the Washington Times indicates to me, that they are pro illegal immigration, that  is not in  the American  workers interest. They have consistently reacted to any enforcement of laws. They are obviously adverse to any immigration restriction, as the majority of the national press have indicated to us. Unlike the rural media who do not condone DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano's rush to OVERPOPULATION through another HEALTH CARE REFORM? BLANKET AMNESTY? Grade your Senator of Congressman/Woman on NUMBERSUSA website. Call them and reprimand them for approving another AMNESTY or anything else at 202-224-3121. The people of America have been blindsided to long and must become more involved. We all no by now we cannot trust our government anymore to do the right thing for all of us. To survive we must fight back or financially--SINK. Washington is truly a corrupt place, where taxpayers money is the bargaining chip. Read all at JUDICIAL WATCH, CAPSWEB, ALIPAC, AMERICAN PATROL & THE DARK SIDE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.


November 18. 2009 19:42
trackback
Trackback from uberVU - social comments

Social comments and analytics for this post


United States IP 
November 19. 2009 16:18
IP
Well said.  Attrition is the answer.


November 28. 2009 11:24
Sarah Homewood
Finally!  A relevant, intelligent post about a subject matter that so much wisdom is missing.  Many thanks for sharing this inventive and intelligent commentary with the world. We definitely need  more sense like you've shown here.  I appreciate it very much Smile


November 29. 2009 06:02
online games
Could you pleasee provide more information on this topic? BTW your blog is totally great. Cheers!!!


November 29. 2009 15:08
term life quotes
ohhh nice info


November 30. 2009 21:25
Carroll B. Merriman
Helath care reform will still mean people need to get long term care insurance.

Comments are closed

Recent Comments

Comment RSS
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2010 Brushfire Sparks